Andrew Bird

Year of Call: 1987

"Andrew Bird is a genius for criminal law, POCA and cash forfeiture work."

Chambers and Partners 2018 for POCA Work and Asset Forfeiture (all circuits).

Please fill out the form below and either Andrew or one of our highly qualified Clerks will respond within 48 hours.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish a solicitor-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Alternatively, you can call us on +44 (0) 207 332 5400


A specialist in white collar crime, civil and criminal asset forfeiture, civil and public law proceedings regarding the criminal process. He is an expert in private prosecution cases and has been involved in a number of substantial private prosecutions for fraud in the last 3 years, acting for both the private prosecutor and the defence.  He was first junior to David Perry QC in D Limited v A [2017] EWCA Crim 1172, where the Court of Appeal overturned a Judge’s terminating ruling and gave guidance in relation to a number of issues including motive  and prosecutorial conduct.

Ranked as a star Individual in Chambers and Partners in the fields of POCA work and asset forfeiture (all circuits) and ranked as a Tier 1 leading individual in the Legal 500 in the field of POCA and asset forfeiture (London Bar). He is also ranked in Who's Who at the UK Bar in the field of asset recovery work. 

He is appointed to the Attorney General's 'A' list panel for government work and acts in cases of the highest complexity.

‘Excellent at proceeds of crime because of his knowledge of the area.’

Legal 500 2019.

"Very knowledgeable, commercial and practical." "When we go to him, we know we have a fount of knowledge we can draw upon."

Chambers and Partners 2019.

Additional Information

In 2000 Andrew was appointed as an examiner of the High Court.

Andrew is a contributing Editor to leading encyclopaedia Smith, Owen and Bodnar on Asset Recovery (OUP, 2008-2015).

"He's good strategically, good on his feet and good on paper."

Chambers and Partners 2017.

‘A complete expert in this area [POCA & Asset Forfeiture], who combines practical knowledge with great judgement.’

Legal 500 2017.


Andrew is a regular presenter of seminars for Central Law Training, POCLA, Police Forces, Association of Police Lawyers, National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA) and others.

He is also an Expert presenter to European Commission CITES and Wildlife Crime Enforcement Group: 2012.

Direct Public Access

  • Accepts Direct Public Access instructions.

Professional Panel Appointments

  • Standing Counsel to the RCPO: 2005.
  • Standing Counsel to the DWP: 2008.
  • Attorney-General’s “A” List civil panel for treasury and other government work, 2012. 
  • Level 4 CPS Prosecutor: 2012.
  • Level 4 Specialist CPS Prosecutor for Fraud, POCA and Serious Crime.


  • MA, Trinity Hall, University of Cambridge.
  • Inns of Court School of Law.

Professional Memberships

  • Criminal Bar Association.
  • Proceeds of Crime Lawyers’ Association.
  • South-Eastern Circuit.

Crime + View All Specialist Areas

Andrew is a specialist practitioner dealing in excise and VAT fraud, investment fraud, money-laundering, drug trafficking, medicines, and wildlife crime.

"He straddles the divide between civil and criminal law with comfort, and he's fantastic at judging a tribunal. He really knows his onions. You can put a point to him and he'll come up with creative solutions quickly, which is what you want in a barrister."

Chambers and Partners 2017

Cases of Note


Re A; CCE v A [2003] 2 All ER 736

Approach of court when confiscation enforcement proceedings are in conflict with matrimonial proceedings involving an innocent wife.

R v UMBS Online limited; R v P [2007] EWCA Crim 3128

POCA Restraint Orders for online bank; release of funds for legal expenses; compatibility with Convention Rights.

R v B [2008] EWCA Crim 1374

Need for evidence of dissipation risk in application for Restraint Order.

R v Allpress, Symeou and Morris [2009] EWCA Crim 8; [2009] 2 cr App R (S) 58

How benefit is to be calculated for the purposes of confiscation in money-laundering cases.

R v White, Dennard, Perry & Rowbotham [2010] EWCA Crim 978

Proper approach to benefit in confiscation cases involving tobacco smuggling; liability to pay excise duty; impact of EU Legislation.

R v Walker [2011] EWCA Crim 103, [2011] 2 CR App R (S) 54

Whether interest of potential beneficiary under discretionary trust is “property” for the purposes of confiscation.

R v Ghori [2012] EWCA Crim 1115

Propriety of Judge disregarding High Court charging order when assessing value of recoverable amount.


Ali v Best (1995) 161 JP 393

Evidence in cash forfeiture cases; admissibility of “habits and doings”.

Hashwani v Letherby (1998) 162 JP 153

Forfeiture of endangered species.

R (Hoverspeed) V CCE [2003] QB 1041

Judicial Review of HMRC search and seizure policies in relation to alcohol and tobacco importations; impact of EU Legislation.

R (CC of Lancashire) v Burnley MC [2003] EWHC 3308 (Admin)

Whether it was an abuse of process to apply for forfeiture of cash following a failed detention application.

R (Newbury) v CCE [2003] 1 WLR 2131

ECHR implications of condemnation and forfeiture; proportionality.

R (Mudie) v Kent Magistrates Court [2003] 2 All ER 631

Condemnation is civil not criminal; availability of legal aid.

R (Sissen) v Newcastle Crown Court [2004] EWHC 1905 (Admin)

Judicial Review of condemnation of endangered species – CITES.

ARA v He & Chen [2004] EWHC 3021 (Admin)

ECHR compatibility of civil recovery and interim receiverships.

Muneka v CCE [2005] EWHC 495 (Admin)

Elements and means of proof in cash forfeiture applications.

R v Payton [2006] EWCA Crim 1226

Relationship between parallel criminal and civil (cash forfeiture) proceedings – approach to be adopted.

HMRC v Pisciotto [2009] EWHC 1991 (Admin)

Admissibility of evidence in cash forfeiture cases.

Angus v UKBA [2011] EWHC 461 (Admin)

What has to be proved in cash forfeiture applications (departing from Muneka – above).

UKBA v Tuncel & Basbaydar [2012] EWHC 402 (Admin)

Elements of proof in cash forfeiture.


R v Montila [2004] 1 WLR 3141

Leading House of Lords case on the elements of money-laundering offences under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 and Drug Trafficking Act 1988.

M v Isleworth Crown Court [2005] EWHC 363 (Admin)

Role of the Admin Court in Bail decisions post-CJA 2003.

R v Rehman [2006] EWCA Crim 1600

Customs questioning, cautions and PACE.

R v Creed & Finn [2006] EWCA Crim 3299

Sentencing in baggage handler drug importation case following trial based on supergrass evidence.

R v F & B [2008] EWCA Crim 1868

Means of proof in money-laundering prosecutions.

R v Barclay & Metcalf (Norwich Crown Court, 2006)

CITES and wildlife prosecution.

R v K [2007] EWCA Crim 54

POCA money-laundering offences; prosecutor’s appeal.

R v Shabbir Hussain [2010] EWCA Crim 970

Whether possession in the UK of Class C controlled drugs with intent to supply them abroad amounts to an offence under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971.

R v David John Wain (Reading Crown Court, November 2010)

Innovative prosecution following SOCA investigation of supplier of Benzocaine and other cutting agents and “legal high” drug GBL.

R v UMBS Online ltd (Southwark Crown Court, February 2011)

Prosecution of online bank for fraudulent trading and money-laundering.

R v Williams (Bournemouth Crown Court, March 2012)

Prosecution of yacht broker for false accounting and evasion of VAT on supply of boats from Channel Islands.

R v E & others (Isleworth Crown Court, September 2012)

Alleged land banking fraud.

R v D & others (Southwark Crown Court, January 2013)

Alleged land banking fraud.


R (Mercury & Masters) v Leeds Crown Court and HMRC [2008] EWHC 2721 (Admin); [2009] Stc 743

Judicial Review of search warrants; whether reasonable grounds for believing that tax mitigation scheme amounted to an offence; full and frank disclosure.

R (Faisaltex & others) v Preston Crown Court, Chief Constable of Lancashire Constabulary and HMRC [2009] 1 WLR 1867

Judicial review of PACE search warrants and special procedure warrants; treatment of computers which contain both relevant and irrelevant material.

R (Windsor & Hare) v HMRC [2011] EWHC 1899 (Admin)

Nature of relief and retention by investigators of copies when search warrants are quashed.

R (Glenn & co) v HMRC [2011] EWHC 2998 (Admin)

Judicial Review of Search Warrants.