Andrew Bird is a specialist in white collar crime, civil and criminal asset forfeiture, and civil and public law proceedings regarding the criminal process. Having prosecuted cases for the state at the highest level he now has a thriving practice in private prosecution cases, particularly those involving allegations of fraud. He has acted for both the private prosecutor and the defence. He was first junior to David Perry QC in D Limited v A  EWCA Crim 1172, where the Court of Appeal overturned a Judge’s terminating ruling and gave guidance in relation to a number of issues including motive and conduct in private prosecutions. In early 2019, led by Jonathan Laidlaw QC he represented a defendant to a private prosecution for fraud and successfully argued for the dismissal of all charges. In between, he continues his practice as a leading junior in cases involving public law challenges to the criminal and investigative processes.
Andrew is ranked as a star Individual in Chambers and Partners in the fields of POCA work and asset forfeiture (all circuits) and also ranked in Chambers and Partners in financial crime. He is ranked in the Legal 500 as a Tier 1 leading individual in the field of POCA and asset forfeiture (London Bar). Andrew is recognised in Who's Who Legal at the UK Bar in the field of asset recovery work.
"Has a very good eye for detail and particularly enjoys researching tricky legal issues. He always instils confidence in us and the courts that he knows his subject inside out."
"Andrew Bird is a veritable genius in POCA. Academic judges respect his detailed and persuasive skeleton arguments."
Chambers and Partners 2020.
He is appointed to the Attorney General's 'A' list panel for government work and acts in cases of the highest complexity. He has been standing counsel to RCPO and the DWP and was on the SFO A Panel for 5 years.
‘Excellent at proceeds of crime because of his knowledge of the area.’
Legal 500 2019.
"Very knowledgeable, commercial and practical." "When we go to him, we know we have a fount of knowledge we can draw upon."
Chambers and Partners 2019.
In 2000 Andrew was appointed as an examiner of the High Court.
Andrew is a contributing Editor to leading encyclopaedia Smith, Owen and Bodnar on Asset Recovery (OUP, 2008-2019).
"He's good strategically, good on his feet and good on paper."
Chambers and Partners 2017.
‘A complete expert in this area [POCA & Asset Forfeiture], who combines practical knowledge with great judgement.’
Legal 500 2017.
Andrew is a regular presenter of seminars for Central Law Training, POCLA, Police Forces, Association of Police Lawyers, National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA), the NCA and others.
He has also been an Expert presenter to the European Commission CITES and Wildlife Crime Enforcement Group: 2012.
Direct Public Access
- Accepts Direct Public Access instructions.
Professional Panel Appointments
- Standing Counsel to the RCPO: 2005.
- Standing Counsel to the DWP: 2008.
- SFO A Panel 2012-2017.
- Attorney-General’s “A” List civil panel for treasury and other government work, 2012.
- Level 4 CPS Prosecutor: 2012.
- Level 4 Specialist CPS Prosecutor for Fraud, POCA and Serious Crime.
- MA, Trinity Hall, University of Cambridge.
- Inns of Court School of Law.
- Criminal Bar Association.
- Fraud Lawyers’ Association.
- Proceeds of Crime Lawyers’ Association.
- South-Eastern Circuit.
Andrew is often instructed in financial and business crime cases. He was instructed by the Serious Fraud Office in the Rolls-Royce investigation which led to a Deferred Prosecution Agreement. He was also instructed in another major SFO investigation. He regularly acts for the FCA on the asset recovery aspects of multiple-victim frauds.
More recently he has been involved as first junior for the private prosecution in the terminating ruling appeal and subsequent trial in D Limited v A  EWCA Crim 1172, and as first junior for a Defendant who successfully applied for the dismissal of a £22 million private prosecution for conspiracy to defraud. He is presently instructed in two further private prosecutions, one for the prosecution and one for the defendant.
Other recent work include two ground-breaking prosecutions for land-banking fraud, including confiscation and compensation, the prosecution of an online bank for fraudulent trading, prosecutions for laundering the proceeds of MTIC and other frauds, and prosecutions for VAT and excise fraud.
"An extremely fine lawyer, who's very practical and well regarded by the judges as someone they trust. He is straightforward and to the point in his advocacy." "A fount of all knowledge on criminal matters and very effective on his feet."
Chambers and Partners 2020.
Cases of Note
ASSET FORFEITURE – CRIMINAL
Re A; CCE v A  2 All ER 736
Approach of court when confiscation enforcement proceedings are in conflict with matrimonial proceedings involving an innocent wife.
R v UMBS Online limited; R v P  EWCA Crim 3128
POCA Restraint Orders for online bank; release of funds for legal expenses; compatibility with Convention Rights.
R v B  EWCA Crim 1374
Need for evidence of dissipation risk in application for Restraint Order.
R v Allpress, Symeou and Morris  EWCA Crim 8;  2 cr App R (S) 58
How benefit is to be calculated for the purposes of confiscation in money-laundering cases.
R v Najafpour  EWCA Crim 2723;  2 Cr. App. R. (S.) 38
How an irrecoverable debt is to be valued for the purposes of “available amount” in confiscation.
R v White, Dennard, Perry & Rowbotham  EWCA Crim 978
Proper approach to benefit in confiscation cases involving tobacco smuggling; liability to pay excise duty; impact of EU Legislation. Leading case in the so-called “Chambers Review” of historic confiscation cases involving excise duty, in which Andrew was lead counsel for RCPO.
R v Walker  EWCA Crim 103,  2 CR App R (S) 54
Whether interest of potential beneficiary under discretionary trust is “property” for the purposes of confiscation.
R v Ghori  EWCA Crim 1115
Propriety of Judge disregarding High Court charging order when assessing value of recoverable amount.
R v Taylor & Wood  EWCA Crim 1151
EU Law aspects of liability to pay excise duty and consequences for confiscation proceedings; post-Waya proportionality
R v Powell & Westwood  EWCA Crim 1043,  Env LR 11
Leading case on confiscation benefit following environmental pollution conviction; circumstances in which Court will disregard corporate veil in confiscation proceedings. Benefit (pecuniary advantage) to a company was held not to have been obtained by the director.
ASSET FORFEITURE – CIVIL
Ali v Best (1995) 161 JP 393
Evidence in cash forfeiture cases; admissibility of “habits and doings”.
Hashwani v Letherby (1998) 162 JP 153
Forfeiture of endangered species - ivory.
R v West London MC, ex p Lamai (DC) 6.7.00 and  EWCA Civ 1501
Time limit for appeal against cash forfeiture decision
Butt v HMRC  EWHC Admin 1066
Standard of proof in cash forfeiture
R (Hoverspeed) V CCE  QB 1041
Judicial Review of HMRC search and seizure policies in relation to alcohol and tobacco importations; impact of EU Legislation.
R (CC of Lancashire) v Burnley MC  EWHC 3308 (Admin)
Whether it was an abuse of process to apply for forfeiture of cash following a failed detention application.
R (Newbury) v CCE  1 WLR 2131
ECHR implications of condemnation and forfeiture; proportionality.
R (Mudie) v Kent Magistrates Court  2 All ER 631
Condemnation is civil not criminal; availability of legal aid.
R (Sissen) v Newcastle Crown Court  EWHC 1905 (Admin)
Judicial Review of condemnation of endangered species – CITES.
ARA v He & Chen  EWHC 3021 (Admin)
ECHR compatibility of civil recovery and interim receiverships.
Muneka v CCE  EWHC 495 (Admin)
Elements and means of proof in cash forfeiture applications.
R (Bartholomew) v HMRC  EWHC 1666 (Admin)
Condemnation of Excise Goods and proportionality
R v Payton  EWCA Crim 1226
Relationship between parallel criminal and civil (cash forfeiture) proceedings – approach to be adopted.
RE B  EWHC 1291 (Admin)
Production Orders (High Court) in Detained Cash Investigations
HMRC v Pisciotto  EWHC 1991 (Admin)
Admissibility of evidence in cash forfeiture cases.
Angus v UKBA  EWHC 461 (Admin)
What has to be proved in cash forfeiture applications (departing from Muneka – above).
UKBA v Tuncel & Basbaydar  EWHC 402 (Admin)
Elements of proof in cash forfeiture.
R (Amos) v Maidstone Crown Court  EWCA Civ 1643
Whether condemnation under CEMA 1979 is civil or criminal for the purposes of Art 6 ECHR
Nuro v Home Office  EWHC 462 (Admin)
Causation in cash forfeiture: cash obtained by illegal immigrant through (otherwise lawful) working
R (Merida Oil) v Central Criminal Court  1 WLR 3680
Propriety of conversion of banked funds to cheques for the purposes of seizure
NCA v K (Disclosure Orders)  EWHC 3531 (Admin)
Merits and Procedure in relation to applications for Disclosure Orders
Lauri Love v NCA  2 WLUK 464
Public interest defence to return of computers under Police (Property) Act 1897
FRAUD AND OTHER CRIMINAL
R v Montila  1 WLR 3141
Leading House of Lords case on the elements of money-laundering offences under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 and Drug Trafficking Act 1988.
M v Isleworth Crown Court  EWHC 363 (Admin)
Role of the Admin Court in Bail decisions post-CJA 2003.
R v Rehman  EWCA Crim 1600
Customs questioning, cautions and PACE.
R v Creed & Finn  EWCA Crim 3299
Sentencing in baggage handler drug importation case following trial based on supergrass evidence.
R v F & B  EWCA Crim 1868
Means of proof in money-laundering prosecutions.
R v Barclay & Metcalf (Norwich Crown Court, 2006)
CITES and wildlife prosecution.
R v K  EWCA Crim 54
POCA money-laundering offences; prosecutor’s appeal.
R v Shabbir Hussain  EWCA Crim 970
Whether possession in the UK of Class C controlled drugs with intent to supply them abroad amounts to an offence under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971.
R v David John Wain (Reading Crown Court, November 2010)
Innovative prosecution following SOCA investigation of supplier of Benzocaine and other cutting agents and “legal high” drug GBL.
R v UMBS Online ltd (Southwark Crown Court, February 2011)
Prosecution of online bank for fraudulent trading and money-laundering.
R v Williams (Bournemouth Crown Court, March 2012)
Prosecution of yacht broker for false accounting and evasion of VAT on supply of boats from Channel Islands.
R v Eshpari & others (Isleworth Crown Court, September 2012)
Land banking fraud.
R v Maynard & others (Southwark Crown Court, January 2013-2019)
Land banking fraud.
R v Sandeep Singh Gill (Isleworth Crown Court)
Money-laundering and facilitation of MTIC fraud.
D Limited v A Southwark Crown Court  EWCA Crim 1172
Whether motive and conduct of private prosecutor amounted to abuse of process.
AW v SP and Others Southwark Crown Court, December 2018
Private Prosecution for conspiracy to defraud
JUDICIAL REVIEW – SEARCH WARRANT AND OTHER CRIMINAL PROCESS
R (Mercury & Masters) v Leeds Crown Court and HMRC  EWHC 2721 (Admin);  Stc 743
Judicial Review of search warrants; whether reasonable grounds for believing that tax mitigation scheme amounted to an offence; full and frank disclosure.
R (Faisaltex & others) v Preston Crown Court, Chief Constable of Lancashire Constabulary and HMRC  1 WLR 1867
Judicial review of PACE search warrants and special procedure warrants; treatment of computers which contain both relevant and irrelevant material.
R (Morville Trading) v Manchester Crown Court  EWHC 3680 (Admin)
Special Procedure Production Order; approach to be taken to LPP.
R (Wood) v North Avon MC  EWHC 3614 (Admin)
Multiple challenges to search warrant; need for full and frank disclosure
R (Whiston-Dew & Richards) v HMRC  EWHC 3761 (Admin)
Obligations of disclosure in relation to judicial reviews of search warrants
R (Windsor & Hare) v HMRC  EWHC 1899 (Admin)
Nature of relief and retention by investigators of copies when search warrants are quashed.
R (Glenn & co) v HMRC  EWHC 2998 (Admin)
Judicial Review of Search Warrants. How material should be specified.
R (Anand) v HMRC  EWHC 2989 (Admin)
Need for precision in drafting of search warrant; whether order should be made for return of items seized
R (Hoque & Das) v City of London MC  EWHC 725 Admin
Search warrant for restaurant premises suspected of VAT fraud lacked specificity, but correctly included computers and mobile phones as items to be sought
R (Panesar) v CCC and HMRC  EWCA Civ 1613;  1 WLR 2577 (DC and CA)
Challenges to orders made under s.59 Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001; (on appeal) whether criminal cause or matter and the nature of s.59 applications
R (Chatwani) v Birmingham MC and NCA  EWHC 1283 (Admin)
Challenge to search warrants - egregious NCA conduct that they should be permitted to gain no advantage from warrants – relief
R (Chatwani) v Birmingham CC and NCA  EWHC 1284 (Admin) POCA CASE
Production Order under POCA
Chatwani v NCA  UKIPTrib 15_84_88-CH
Challenge to authorisations for property interference under Police Act 1997
R (Sharer) v CLMC and HMRC  EWHC 1412 (Admin)
Challenge to warrant authorising seizure of computers from estate agent; whether special procedure
R (Lowden) v Gateshead MC  EWHC 3536 (Admin);  4 WLR 43
Judicial Review by private prosecutor of decision not to issue a summons in a case where the defendant had been cautioned; examination of cautioning procedure
R (Malik) v Manchester & Salford MC  EWHC 3723 (Admin) and  EWCA Civ 815
Challenge to searches under warrant; terms of relief; (on appeal) whether criminal cause or matter
R (Hart) v HMRC  EWHC 3091 Admin
Full and Frank Disclosure; as to whether Production Order (rather than search warrant) would be appropriate.
R (Fitzgerald) v Preston Crown Court  EWHC 804 (Admin)
Observations by the court on the need for clarity in applications for warrants in complex cases
R (Singh Virdee) v NCA  1 WLR 5073
Priority between use of statutory post-arrest search powers and search warrants
R (HMRC) v Maidstone Crown Court  EWHC 2219 Admin
Approach to application under s.59 Criminal Justice and Police 2001