John Crawford

Year of Call: 2016

A specialist in criminal and extradition work with additional experience of acting in family and regulatory cases.

Our specialist clerks can be contacted by email on or phone on 020 7332 5400. To contact our Chambers Director directly in relation to a specific members’ practice, please email

To contact John Crawford directly please email


John has a growing practice in all areas of criminal law and has been instructed in cases of robbery, rape, sexual assault, and burglary. He has appeared in numerous cases involving youths and is familiar with the additional issues and particular vulnerabilities that often arise when dealing with young clients.

John’s extradition practice includes both part 1 and part 2 warrants, including requests from the United States and Albania. He has particular experience in relation to s2 arguments on the legality of warrants, as well as under s25 in relation to requested persons’ health.

John has advised private and legally aided clients in relation to various areas of family law and appeared in both the County Court and the High Court in contested hearings.

His regulatory work has included acting in a number of regulatory matters ranging from health and safety prosecutions to acting on behalf of the Forestry Commission in a case concerning illegal felling.

These are the views of some of the solicitors who have instructed John:

‘His diligence; ability to quickly grasp facts and the law, as well as to act appropriately for our clients is impressive’

‘an easy and effective manner in his advocacy skills. He has a smooth style of delivery, measured in his speech and carefully chooses his words.’

‘Mr Crawford has been efficient in his paperwork, diligent in his preparation of cases and has always maintained good contact throughout his involvement in cases’

Professional panel appointments

  • Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) Grade 2 Prosecutor.
  • CPS Specialist Prosecutor: Extradition Grade 1.

Additional information


  • BPTC: University of Law: Outstanding.
  • BA Law (Cantab): Cambridge: First.


  • Gray’s Inn Reid Scholarship.
  • University of Law Employment Law award (BPTC).
  • Lamb Building Advanced Criminal Procedure award (BPTC).
  • Ng Law award (Jesus College Cambridge).

Professional Memberships

  • Defence Extradition Lawyers Forum.
  • Young Fraud Lawyers Association.

Criminal Defence + View All Specialist Areas

John has been instructed in a range of Crown Court and Magistrates Court matters for the defence. He has been instructed in cases involving vulnerable witnesses and issues relating to insanity and fitness to plea. He has also acted on behalf of clients facing a range of violent, drug related or fraud charges either at trial or for sentencing.

John has developed expertise in serious youth court cases, representing youths accused of rape, sexual assault, robbery and fraud. This has included a five-handed youth case heard over 5 non-consecutive days, where the Defendants were accused of attempted robbery on a joint enterprise basis. He also represented an 11-year-old accused of rape, attempted rape and sexual assault in a 3-day trial, obtaining an acquittal on the main charge and ultimately securing a non-custodial sentence for the client.

John also has experience of dealing with POCA proceedings included contested hearings. He has also dealt with other post-conviction matters including applications for football banning orders.

Cases of Note


McMCS v JS (2020)

A private prosecution for fraud against a pub owner who had kept the proceeds of a charity fundraiser for themselves and falsely created a thank you certificate. The Defendant was convicted following trial, having maintained that he had sent the cheque in the post. The case was reported in the local press.

R v SD (2020)

Prosecution of a woman who pleaded guilty to offences under the Communications Act involving hundreds of calls to the police over a several years. The cost to the emergency services of responding was over £500,000. The case attracted national press attention.

R v AK (2020)

John’s client was facing an indictment of ABH, harassment and several assaults in a domestic context. Following the serving of an application to dismiss the Crown dropped the ABH from the indictment. After further submissions on the case generally, focusing on flaws in the Crown’s evidence and the Defendant’s mental health a plea to a single common assault was accepted leading to a conditional discharge.

R v TR (2019)

A combined sentencing for 3 Crown Court cases where John’s client ultimately pleaded to offences of s20, PWITS class B and x2 possession of bladed article along with other associated matters. Following numerous psychiatric reports and a 3 hour sentencing hearing, a sentence totalling 2y 10m was imposed for all offences.

R v RM (2018)

Youth Court case where the Defendant, an 11y.o boy, faced 3 charges of a rape, attempted rape and sexual assault against a 12y.o boy. D was acquitted on count 1 and convicted on count 2 but received a non-custodial sentence.


Daniel Siwak v Circuit Court of Tarnobrzeg (Poland) [2020] EWHC 1776 (Admin)

A successful appeal against a DJ’s decision to order extradition notwithstanding the Requested Person’s Article 8 rights. John successfully argued that the DJ had taken a flawed approach to delay in the case, as well as incorrectly categorising the offending as dangerous driving not a lesser offence. These submissions were accepted by the Court and the client’s discharge was ordered.

Zelenko v Prosecutor General’s Office Latvia [2019] EWHC 3840 and [2020] EWHC 1800 (Admin)

Administrative Court case appealing against the decision of the DJ that extradition was not barred by reason of the Requested Person’s health under s25 EA 2003. Relying on the CPT report on Lativa it was successfully argued that the principals in Magiera v Poland [2017] EWHC 2757 applied and the DJ had erred in ordering extradition. Latvia was ordered to serve medical assurances, when these were served late the case was restored to a Divisional Court to consider the Court’s jurisdiction to hear the case and the proper application.

Murin v Czech Republic [2018] EWHC 1532 (Admin)

Divisional court case concerning the legality of a warrant under s2 where the RP was sought prior to a suspended sentence being activated. Two points of law of public importance were certified.


CFC v LA (2019)

A licencing case arising out of an investigation into s18 GBH. Appearing on behalf of the Local Authority John successfully argued against the premises being allowed to keep their licence in a 2 day hearing.