Ben Keith writes for Newsweek: “INTERPOL Must Not Elect One of Its Chief Abusers As Its Next President | Opinion” The article was first published on the Newsweek website on 26 November 2025.
INTERPOL delegates, including police chiefs, ministers and senior officials from all 196 member countries, are gathering to elect the organization’s next president. At stake is not a ceremonial title but the integrity of the world’s most important system of police cooperation. And the frontrunner, Turkey’s Mustafa Serkan Sabanca, appeared in a classified memo released this week that shows him advising officials on how to get around INTERPOL’s rules.
In the leaked memo, Sabanca “kindly requested” that Turkish officials recast a politically motivated case against a human rights lawyer in exile as an embezzlement matter. The original allegations, tied to the Gülen movement, could never survive Article 3, INTERPOL’s ban on political cases. The solution he proposed was simple deception. The memo is not ambiguous. It is not theoretical. It is a written instruction on how to disguise a political prosecution so it might pass through INTERPOL unnoticed.
The prospect of Sabanca’s election is akin to putting the North Koreans on the U.N. Human Rights Council. The contradiction is so absolute that it requires no elaboration. INTERPOL exists to shield global policing from political misuse; Sabanca has presided over precisely that misuse.
Turkey’s record makes the picture starker still. Earlier this year, the U.K. Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights heard evidence stating that the country trails only Russia and China in its abuse of the Red Notice system, a tool similar in effect to an international arrest request, to target political opponents abroad. Since the 2016 coup attempt, Turkish authorities have submitted more than 3,500 Red Notice and diffusion requests aimed at alleged Gülen sympathizers—an unending stream of political vendettas packaged as criminal charges.
Against this backdrop, Sabanca’s memo is not an aberration. It is an insight into the system he helped build. The document is a clear indication that Sabanca advised Turkey’s National Central Bureau to disguise the real basis of an extradition attempt. The method is familiar: present dissent as fraud, opposition as organized crime, journalism as terrorism. The objective is always the same: to lure foreign courts, and INTERPOL itself, into treating political persecution as ordinary law enforcement.
The human consequences are not abstract. The lawyer targeted in the memo, now granted asylum in Belgium, fears the personal reach Sabanca would gain if elevated to INTERPOL’s top office. He is right to be afraid. A presidency that legitimizes such tactics would place dissidents, refugees and exiles in immediate jeopardy. Their safety depends on an assumption of neutrality. That assumption would not survive Sabanca’s election.
Democratic states, too, would feel the cost. INTERPOL’s authority relies on trust: trust that Red Notices reflect genuine criminality, trust that leaders uphold the organization’s constitution, trust that political neutrality means something. When the presidency is handed to an individual documented as seeking to erode those safeguards, the entire system becomes suspect. Judges will hesitate. Border officers will doubt. States will retreat from cooperation. Criminals, not authoritarians, will be the beneficiaries.
This is not a minor governance dispute; it is a test of whether INTERPOL can still act as the guardian of its own legitimacy. Member states have just hours left to prevent a profound error. Electing Sabanca would telegraph a message to abusive governments everywhere: persistence is rewarded, manipulation is forgiven and the rules are negotiable.
Symbols matter. Leadership matters more. An organization that depends on political neutrality cannot be led by a man who has already demonstrated a willingness to subvert it. The memo published this week makes the stakes unmistakable.
Member states should vote accordingly. The credibility of INTERPOL, and the safety of those who rely on it, demands nothing less.
The full article is available to view on the Newsweek website, here.
Ben Keith is a leading barrister specialising in cross-border and international cases. He deals with all aspects of extradition, immigration, human rights, mutual legal assistance, Interpol, financial crime and international law, including sanctions. He represents governments, political and military leaders, high net worth individuals, human rights defenders and business leaders in the most sensitive cases. He is a leading authority on the removal of Interpol Red Notices for worldwide clients. He edits the Red Notice Monitor blog.
Ben has extensive experience of appellate proceedings before the Administrative and Divisional Courts, Civil and Criminal Divisions of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court as well as applications and appeals to the European Court of Human Rights and the United Nations.
Ben has significant expertise in post-soviet states, as well the Middle East and the Far East.
He is ranked in Chambers and Partners as a star leader in the field of extradition at the London Bar and in The Legal 500 as a Tier 1 leading individual in extradition. Ben is also ranked in Chambers and Partners in the field of immigration and in its Financial Crime: High Net Worth Individuals rankings. He is recognised in The Spears’ 500 2024 Guide as a ‘Recommended Immigration Law Barrister’.
