John McNamara

Year of Call: 2014

John is a dedicated criminal barrister. He specialises in crime, business crime and confiscation cases.

Please fill out the form below and either John or one of our highly qualified Clerks will respond within 48 hours.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish a solicitor-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Alternatively, you can call us on +44 (0) 207 332 5400

Overview

John is building a strong Crown Court practice representing defendants charged with a variety of serious criminal matters including fraud, firearms, grievous bodily harm and perverting the course of justice.

Instructing solicitors have observed that John goes the extra mile in cases involving young and vulnerable people. He places great importance in caring for the lay client throughout their case whether they are a business professional or a vulnerable person.

John is regularly instructed in the Magistrates’ Court on a privately funded basis. He accepts instructions in a range of driving matters and has successfully defended a number of individuals facing charges of drink driving.

Additional information

Prior to joining chambers, John worked as a paralegal for two years at Hickman & Rose solicitors. During that time John assisted senior partners in various cases concerning manslaughter, gross negligence manslaughter and historical sexual allegations.

While working in Hickman & Rose’s Corporate Crime department John was part of the team who represented the first LIBOR trader to be exonerated by the FCA's Regulatory Decisions Committee.

Education

  • BBP Law School, BPTC; Very Competent
  • BBP Law School, GDL; Commendation
  • University of Warwick, BA (Hons.) History; 2.1

Awards

  • Ann Felicity Goddard Scholarship, Gray’s Inn (2017)

Professional Memberships

  • Criminal Bar Association.
  • Young Fraud Lawyer’s Association.

Asset Recovery, Civil Fraud & Confiscation

John accepts instructions in confiscation matters.

John has appeared at enforcement proceedings at the Magistrates’ Court regarding the non-payment of orders to resist the activation of default sentences. 

Business Crime

Having worked as a paralegal on document-heavy cases (such as LIBOR), John has a detailed understanding of the unique demands of financial criminal cases. He accepts instructions in financial and business crime cases.

Crime

John’s principle area of practice is criminal law and he accepts instructions in criminal cases of all levels.

Before joining the Bar John developed significant experience in litigating criminal cases. John enjoys engaging with instructing solicitors throughout a case to achieve the best result for the lay client. During his time as a paralegal he wrote an article outlining issues poor disclosure may have in historical sex cases. He is also experienced in working with experts; in a case concerning gross negligence manslaughter against a nurse John liaised with a nursing expert. The resulting report resulted in no evidence being offered on the gross negligence manslaughter charge.

Professional Discipline & Regulatory

John accepts professional discipline and regulatory instructions.

Cases of Note

Crime

R v JM

Instructed in committal for sentence in a case concerning producing indecent images of children. Successfully argued a suspended sentence was appropriate with a 5 year SHPO (the prosecution having sought an indefinite term).

R v MR

Represented a young vulnerable woman charged with robbery at the Crown Court. After extensive mitigation and issues relating to the crossing a significant age threshold, the sentence was deferred. At the same time acted in ongoing Magistrates’ Court proceedings for MR and drafted a letter of representations resulting in those charges being discontinued.

R v GP

Instructed as junior counsel (led by Queen’s Counsel) in case concerning allegations of sexual assault and false imprisonment before the case was discontinued by the prosecution. Continued to be instructed in claim for wasted costs.

R v K

Acted for a defendant charged who had fraudulently claimed a £20,000 lottery ticket. Following mitigation the sentence the court imposed was significantly below the sentencing guidelines range.

R v GE

Represented the defendant charged with perverting the court of justice in sentencing proceedings at the Central Criminal Court. The case involved issues concerning turning Queen’s Evidence and a disputed basis of plea. Suspended sentence imposed.

R v G

Instructed in four-handed, three-day youth court case concerning public order offences. Following representations G was the only defendant to have the case dropped against them at the halfway stage.