Overview
John’s practice is centred upon complex fraud cases, both as a trial advocate and as disclosure counsel. In addition, John has developed a specialism in work relating to legal professional privilege and is regularly instructed as independent counsel to conduct large-scale reviews of material. In recent years, John has been instructed on numerous cases by the FCA, including some of their most significant proceedings, as lead independent counsel heading up a team of reviewers and assuming responsibility for the overall management of the reviews.
John combines a detailed knowledge of the law (specifically as it relates to disclosure and legal professional privilege) with a practical ability to manage document-heavy cases, not least due to his familiarity with various types of software and document review platforms.
Professional Panel Appointments
-
Level 3 Advocate on the CPS Panel of Approved Counsel.
-
Level 3 Specialist Fraud Advocate on the CPS panel of approved counsel.
Business Crime & Financial Regulation
An understanding of the intricacies involved in complex fraud (including MTIC fraud, VAT and Excise Fraud) has led to John being instructed in high-value fraud cases both for the prosecution and defence. John’s ability to master the factual details of document-heavy cases is complemented by his fluency in the relevant law.
John is acutely aware of the need for the early involvement of counsel in these types of cases, as well as the capacity to work as part of a team.
Criminal Defence
John has been instructed in the most serious types of cases. A naturally persuasive advocate, he is frequently praised for his approach to cases involving young and vulnerable witnesses.
John’s ability is also apparent in the more complex cases. Equally comfortable in document-heavy cases and those involving complicated legal issues, John prides himself on the service he provides not just in the courtroom but also in case preparation.
Criminal Prosecutions - Private & Public
John has been instructed in the most serious types of cases. A naturally persuasive advocate, he is frequently praised for his approach to cases involving young and vulnerable witnesses.
John’s ability is also apparent in the more complex cases. Equally comfortable in document-heavy cases and those involving complicated legal issues, John prides himself on the service he provides not just in the courtroom but also in case preparation.
{QUOTE2}
Cases of Note
R v Pusey and others (Crown Court)
Led junior in this multi-handed prosecution for human trafficking and sexual offences against underage girls. [See above for feedback from the Detective Inspector of the Complex Abuse Unit in Surrey.]
R v Musgrove (Crown Court)
Junior alone representing a defendant charged with rape and other sexual offences against his daughter over a five year period.
R v Vella and Hummerstone (Crown Court)
Led junior in this prosecution of a drugs-related murder in which the victim was killed by masked men in his own home.
R v Stanley (Crown Court)
Junior alone representing a defendant charged with the historic rape and other sexual offences against younger members of his own family.
R v Gaspar and others
Junior alone representing a defendant charged with trafficking women from eastern Europe to the United Kingdom and forcing them to work as prostitutes.
R v Akinluyi and others – Operation Culgao (Crown Court)
Led junior in the prosecution of a multi-million pound conspiracy to import drugs, arising out of a long investigation by the Serious and Organised Crime Agency.
R v Lewinson and Woodford (Crown Court and Court of Appeal)
Junior alone in this prosecution under section 45 of the Serious Crime Act 2007. The defendants were the first ever to be convicted after trial for importing an adulterant used in the supply of heroin.
R v Ogilvie (Crown Court)
Led junior in this prosecution for attempted murder.
R v Stewart (Crown Court)
Junior alone in the prosecution of historic sexual offences committed by a pastoral assistant. This case involved complex legal issues relating both to bad character and hearsay.
R v Franklin and Franklin (Crown Court)
Junior alone in the prosecution for a fraud against Children in Need by the directors of a “Super Car” company.
R v Hagi-Daib & others (Crown Court and Court of Appeal)
Led junior in this multi-handed (18 defendants) prosecution arising out of gang violence on the streets of Woolwich.
R v McDonald
Led junior in this prosecution for historic child sex offences committed by the de factor step-father of four complainants.
R v Uyiekpen & others
Led junior in this multi-handed prosecution arising out of gang violence on the streets of Woolwich.